Lego Movie Run That by Me Again I Wasnt Listening
Had great ideas but couldn't hold itself together
Warning: Spoilers
I guess I'm that one person who didn't like this movie because it has an insanely high score on Rotten Tomaotes. I loved the first movie and actually quite enjoyed Lego Batman. Didn't see Ninjago but I was still excited for the Lego Movie sequel. I attended an early screening a couple weeks ago and I'm sad to say I was pretty let down by it. I was actually shocked that Phil Lord and Chris Miller we're still heavily involved in the script because I had vibes that a writer's room made this movie, but nope they wrote the screenplay. Don't get me wrong, the script has great ideas about unity and friendship in dark times like we live in right now, but the story just wasn't as smooth as it could've been leading into that big theme of the film. It might be because I got older since the last film but the jokes fell a little flat for me and the action scenes were just no where near as memorable. There's an ongoing joke between Batman and the supposed villain who wants to marry him and she sings songs to persuade the main characters. But the song just isn't funny and it's really bizarre. I would've been more forgiving of the jokes if the story had been more interesting too but it lost steam for me pretty quickly. The big twists were either predictable or not as impactful because of the surprise factor the first film had. I really don't know what went wrong here. I just wasn't moved by any of it like I was with the first film and even Lego Batman to a certain extent. It seems like WB has aimed this movie for even younger audiences than before which is fine that's what the movie is made for, but when the first one was so genius it's just hard to like this movie. I personally enjoyed How to Train Your Dragon 3 more than this and highly reccomend that for your next animated film instead of the Lego Movie 2. It's not a terrible film, but it severely lacks the humor and surprise factor the first film did so well. 6/10.
130 out of 185 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Eggo
Warning: Spoilers
The concept is gone.
We are in a golden age of concept folding and our experimental loft is popular film. When the filmmakers hit a sweet spot and adventure in self reference is carried in a hit movie, the whole society becomes more cognitively elaborate.
The original was folded in a few new ways. 'Folding' in general are techniques that play with the filmmaker/viewer contract for cocreating a narrative. In a straight film, the onscreen narrative is distinct from the viewer's world and the filmmaker is simply delivery. When you read the plot description, the film is nothing more but conveyance. A folded film places the viewer somehow in the film, for example a traditional mystery has the viewer co-create the narrative, often with an on-screen surrogate.
The first Lego film was genius. First, a counterpoint to the Pixar philosophy of realism in animation, and the long tradition of animals as humans, this was in your face alternative. The plastic pieces were themselves rendered hyper-realistically and the motion (in that first one only) unusually choppy. These were characters that many of us physically animated and the effect makes us at least potentially comakers.
Add to that another two layers of creators. The main one of course is the storyline about the master builder. It did not matter that it was couched in that old 'kid who is unknowing the saviour'. It had folding power. And then the extra layer at the end. Corny and poorly done, but so effective because it was yet another layer of folding, and unexpected. And the side folds of characters from other films. All pure genius, but only because it caught us by surprise.
That element of surprise folding only works the first time. After that, you get Scooby Doo.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better than expected
I got roped into seeing this with my friend and our kids, and I went in with a bad attitude prepared to hate it. I think I actually liked it more than the kids!! It's really funny, well written for the kids to enjoy but also a lot of adult jokes in there with a great cast. Really recommend.
54 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Something is wrong
I'm having trouble figuring out exactly what it is, but this film is severely lacking in something the first one mastered. Let's start with the easy stuff. There are way too many references and bad puns. Some reviewers would call these references "jokes the adults can understand", and while that is true, they aren't funny. They're just kind of there. They are references that exist for you to say "I get that". There is no "ha" preceding that. Yes, the original also had references and bad puns, but they were used well and there weren't nearly as many. The first LEGO movie was very self aware, but it had a soul that really seemed to care about what it was saying. The second LEGO movie was so self aware that it was very difficult to take seriously. There was an obvious message about how growing up should be about learning to work with different people, but it kind of fell flat beneath the veil of "play with others even if you don't like how they play". It honestly made me a little angry. Maybe it wasn't intentional, but the film seemed to suggest that traditionally masculine things are incapable of being imaginative. I couldn't help but feel a pinch of modern social politics biting for my throat. The first film felt very apolitical, and I believe that's fitting for a film about a franchise of toys that cradled our imaginations before we cared about politics. This film certainly didn't "ruin my childhood" by any means, but it was a disappointment.
61 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Everything (For The Most Part) Is Awesome, Again
The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part-written by this decade's legit greatest animated movie screenwriters, Chris Miller and Phil Lord (who make most of Disney's recent attributes seem like child's play),-comes off as a passably tolerable, vibrantly decorated childrens' feature that later on blossoms itself into a flamingly witty childrens' AND adults' feature that's bound to electrify the little ones while maybe even stuffing the parents with un-toughening amounts of misty-eyed, raw emotion.
So a little background on my experience with the first one. Most people seem to have deemed it as "one of the best animated movies of the decade" back in 2014. I'm not messing around though when I say that I wholeheartedly think that The LEGO Movie IS the best animated movie of the decade! To this day, I view it as the most unexpectedly "awesome" movie I've ever witnessed in my entire life. So as prophesied, I was pleading for this sequel to live up to its predecessor-despite disliking the watery trailers/teaser trailers/teaser teaser trailers/whatever configuration of a trailer I left out-and not bail-out like Hollywood's most popular, trivial, hop-scotch prequel/sequel/spinoff cash grabs.
For the first half of this movie, I can't lie, I was getting a tad concerned that this movie was going to suffer from major sequelitis due to its awfully turbo, too-meta-for-it's-own-good formula-that might I add, has become quite established already since we've seen this recipe fabricated more productively in three other LEGO movies. This mundane scheme appeared to be leading this movie off into oblivion. But, once the film gets kicking, it GETS kicking. The nucleus of this film starts to reveal itself as an emulate of the original LEGO Movie, thanks to its deftly kiddie-like version of a Christopher Nolan screenplay.
The Second Part decides to traverse off into another domain of family morals that sharply resonates as another clever parallel between the real world and the LEGO world that had me, by fair means, moved. Additionally, there are boatloads of themes that are acutely wholesome-although, slightly trite-that kids can blissfully digest. Also, there are some good, good twists in here which ultimately, sustains the LCU's (LEGO Cinematic Universe's) streak of surprises.
Yes, it's not quite as authoritative or proficient as the original but, gosh-darn it, I can't deny that I was meticulously spellbinded by this rib-tickling sequel. Everything is totally not not awesome this time around. (Verdict: B-)
71 out of 109 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Everything is Less Awesome
Five years removed from the infectious first installment, comes a serviceable extension of a story that already had a proper ending. The subtitle The Second Part is surely a half truth considering how this narrative slapped together by the original writers Christopher Miller and Phil Lord seems tacked on in a "Oh let's take a victory lap then" sense. The new director Mike Mitchell is planted into a zero sum game as he tries to reignite the novelty of the first film while propelling a more mature plot that Miller and Lord insisted on being needlessly convoluted. This sequel comes off as a afterthought worthy to stand beside the other spinoff LEGO films, but lacks all of the magic of its predecessor.
The magic present in The LEGO Movie resides in the playful allegory of capitalism mixed with the earned nostalgia of the animation's medium. Not to mention the brilliant reveal of a child's imagination directing the entire story. These are all elements revisited the second time around, but the trick has already been explained by the magician. The world of Brickville goes through sufficient changes almost immediately once toddler-sized LEGO creations attack with unrivaled fury. The brick civilization reverts to a Mad Max world after the invincible fat-bricked organisms regularly search and destroy anything colorful or shiny.
Through some less-than-subtle live action mirage shots early in the film, its apparent that Finn (Jadon Sand) the boy mastermind in the first film is being plagued by his younger sister Bianca (Brooklynn Prince). Her entry-level LEGO creations clash with his more involved and complex structures, and the result is a sibling pair never learning to play in symbiosis. Of course this conflict is merely implied before the lazy live action finale that resolves the paper thin dispute, and wholly lacks the gusto of the first movie's twist. The jig is already up from scene one of the sequel, because we are aware of the children's narrative dictatorship, so none of the LEGO characters' sentience ever feels authentic.
Chris Pratt returns to voice Emmet a happy-go-lucky construction worker who retains a life of cheer in the apocalyptic wasteland. Elizabeth Banks also reprises her role as Lucy, the brawn and brains to Emmet's fumbling optimism. Lucy desperately attempts to calibrate Emmet's persona to something more appropriate to the ruined world they now live in, but he maintains the "everything is awesome" outlook that figures problematic in a much more adult environment. In a hardly tongue-in-cheek fashion, a character outright states the thesis of the movie to be "a statement on the waning affects of adolescence on imagination." This stands as the most egregious example of "meta exploitation," but several runner ups tail close behind.
Falling victim to exhausting cleverness, LEGO Movie 2 doesn't know when to edit its goofs. When you merely reformat the first film's plot to fit another child builder, new additions need to elevate the otherwise regurgitated formula. These additions include ramping up the meta meter to 11 and including two more banger tracks to hopefully burrow into the viewers' minds. The main attraction song here has a hook the repeats endlessly, "This song's gonna get stuck inside your head." Oh and I mustn't forget the cameos, which come with This is the End regularity, and if you can imagine, with far less originality.
I didn't waste your time by running you down a plot synopsis for good reason. The film plays with your expectations in a cheap and unearned fashion without offering any reasonable explanation upon the conclusion other than, "We just wanted to plant red herrings, because...reasons." Screenwriters will go to great (and absurd) lengths to make an unoriginal script appear more interesting. This parasitic sequel will deliver many chuckles and feels to audiences that have already surrendered to the committee-made trajectory of the LEGO universe, but I feel somber for those choosing to double feature this lackadaisical copy with its bold predecessor.
101 out of 153 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tries so hard to be awesome
This sequel tries so hard to be awesome-maybe a little too hard. The humor feels forced and the plot doesn't make a lot of sense. They also try to shoehorn in a message at the end that seems unnecessary. I enjoyed Lego Movie 2, but it's missing the solid structure of the first Lego movie.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The lego franchise is dead
Actually the first lego movie and the lego batman movie are quite awesome, with interesting dialogues and original stories. Yet, this lego Movie 2 essentially kills the lego franchise. The screenplay is chaotic. The singing and dancing are merely noisy. The subplots are just irrelevant. The structure is very loose. The plot does not have any sense of credibility. I hoped that it could have become thrilling at some point, but it never did. There is neither anything new nor anything intriguing in the screenplay.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hello to you too.
With an immensely tough act to follow, this really rises to the challenge in its post-modern humor and visual splendor.
Not only do the songs and the set pieces and the gags totally hit the mark, the source material (you know, lego) is still integral to the plot and the emotional development is sincere and enriching as Emmet, not unlike Spongebob in his first movie, questions whether it's time to grow up.
I like how they made the questionable ending of the previous movie the launch pad of the plot here. It really works.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It just seemed to go on forever
The first LEGO movie was smart, cute, snappy. This one starts out good, but what kind of parents allow the kid sister in the family to just destroy everything her big brother does forever?
So the basis of the plot is that the little boy who is the author of the Lego universe has his kid sister come down into the same space of the house with her Duplos, and repeatedly she just trashes everything cool that the little boy does. She steals some of the Legos and makes them do "girly" things. From the perspective of the Legos, they are just randomly being attacked, and there is no use in building anything attractive because the Duplo aliens will just show up and rip it apart. Thus, over time, the Legos develop a nihilistic Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome outlook that is actually portrayed rather humorously.
I know a little girl who needs to be put on serious KP duty until she is 15 or until she learns the term "personal space". Otherwise, look for her husband to show up in the "Dead Bedrooms" subreddit 20 years from now whining about how ignored and taken for granted he is. For that matter, her kids will be on the "Raised By Narcissists" subreddit complaining of same. But I digress.
So this just becomes repetitive and predictable and ultimately, boring. There are a few great one liners from the Lego cast,but it just can't fill up two hours. This could have been a really good half hour short in the Pixar tradition.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I almost fell asleep
The first half of the movie is just a struggle. The plot was boring and plodding, and you could not connect with any of the characters except Emmet. The second half has more excitement but still suffered through two terrible musical numbers and predictable plot twists you could see coming from a mile away.
Almost all of the magic from the first movie has dissipated, and we are left with the wrinkled prune that is Fox's shameless attempt at cashing in. Incredibles 2 this is not.
52 out of 88 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Boring, aimless sequel
I loved the first Lego Movie (and the game that was made out of it) - the story was funny, the characters lovable and the whole thing was entertaining.
Part 2 is what happens when the sales team decides they need an infusion of money and call down to accounting to hack up a movie in 5 minutes. This is definitely not a kid's movie - it's a soulless, boring hackjob that never even tried to be entertaining - it just wants your money.
I can't really say anything positive about this sequel - my 8-year old fell asleep on it, that's how bad it was. There were literally maybe 2 chuckles in the entire auditorium during the movie - the audience (kids and adults) sat through the whole thing in silence.
There's no coherent story to speak of; the jokes are lame and out of place and there were many pop culture references that were impossible to get for kids. The musinc was mostly just loud.
How the writers managed to ruin characters like Unikitty is simply beyond me - my daughter literally cried that they turned the two-hands-down-cutest-character-ever into a monstrosity.
Stick with the first Lego Movie.
58 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A good sequel
The first Lego movie was surprisingly good, despite its bizarre premise.
This sequel, while not as great as the first film, managed to be a fun follow-up.
Mike Mitchell directed plenty of bad movies in the past ( Such as Deuce Bigalow, Sky High and the third part of Alvin and the Chipmunks) but this is (for me, at least) the best thing he had ever done.
Shame the movie wasn't very succesful, since these Lego movies were charming and fun. In terms of quality it was much better and not as dissapointing as "Ralph Breaks the Internet".
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not so awesome
Warning: Spoilers
What happened between the first Lego Movie and this one? This movie was so boring and that was a surprise. They tried to find another "awesome" song to become popular but failed and just reused the song again... Emmet became a master builder in the last movie and used none of those skills in this one. He got demoted and thus the movie was as well.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Everything is MEH..." Just Doesn't Have the Same Ring To It
I think we've forgotten how monumental The Lego Movie (2014) was. It kicked off one of the least likely film franchises. It cemented Chris Pratt as a lovable movie star. It continued the trajectory of directors Lord and Miller (Jump Street) as filmmakers who make terrible concepts into snarky brilliance. It proved that CGI can be more than sterile carbon copies of Pixar. But most of all it used self-referential humor and meta-commentary to honor imaginative play, never kowtowing to either kids or adults, serving them both equally. Unfortunately, most of that celebratory creativity begins to fade in this chaotic and pale imitation of a sequel. When a race of Duplo-designed aliens transform Lego world into Apocalypseburg, abducting some of its most notable citizens, Emmet and Lucy have to lead an adventure to get their friends back. The meta-humor ("Marvel won't return our calls..."), though fairly one note, is still relatively funny. The songs, of which there are much more, are good. Pratt still shines as the oafish goofball hero, all while sending up his other big franchise roles. Otherwise, throughout the meat of the film, the kinetic plot and comedic brilliance is much less effective and simply less funny. By the end, some story re-positioning works to positively reset everything previous. It really leans into the real-world youth master-builders story more, cleverly playing with the line between their playtime and their imaginative Lego world, revealing a welcome sweetness. But by the time the characters spout off the morals through lame monologues, we're left wondering why they couldn't just leave well-enough alone. Let's just stick with Lego Batman sequels from here on out, deal?
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Don't bother.
Warning: Spoilers
The first Lego movie was great. The Batman one and even Ninjago movies were pretty good. This one is just lame. It doesn't take long to figure out that this whole movie is about the brother and sister fighting while playing with Legos. That premise is easy to figure out since the ending of the first Lego movie was about the dad and son fighting. I kept waiting for this movie to get interesting, it never did. My wife, who is a big Lego fan was even thinking of walking out. This whole movie is one big lovey, touchy, feel good movie or it leads up to that. There really is no villain in this movie. The best part of the movie was listening to the song while the credits were playing. The rest of the movie was just plain boring.
48 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Awesome Once Again!!!!
The Lego Movie 2 is very well crafted, and once again did a clever job at its emotional message just like first one. It's what I've always wanted for a sequel to do and that Catchy Song did its job perfectly.
🎵 This song is gonna get stuck inside your head 🎵
56 out of 90 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another clever, heartwarming 90-minute toy commercial
I was sceptical that a sequel to The LEGO Movie could be pulled off, given that movie's twists and turns in the final act. But Lord & Miller's script pulls it off again. It doesn't have the same surprise, but it retains the heart and love of the product that makes it go beyond a "toy commercial" in to a true heartwarming, entertaining, and most of all, funny movie with a great theme embedded in it. It doesn't quite reach the heights of the predecessor, but it comes so very, very close. It'll be hard not to find something or someone to love in this movie.
90 out of 135 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Disappointing
Warning: Spoilers
When I watched the first LEGO movie I absolutely fell in love with it. I admired the message and most of all the unique sense of humor. Me and my siblings loved it so much we bought it on Blu-ray and the first thing we did was watch it when we got home. I watched this movie more than 20 times and at that point we could recite the ENTIRE movie word for word. Anyways, loved the movie and still do. Then what, 4 years later, I hear there's a sequel coming out and I was as excited as the first time a girl not related to you gives you a hug for the first time. I didn't watch it in theatre's cause I was trying to save my money for a better cause but when it came out on redbox we got it ASAP. After watching the whole movie, man was I upset. I couldn't remember any funny quotes or anything, it was boring! It didn't have much Vitruvius, Lord Business, Bad Cop, Benny, Metal Beard, Batman, and all the funny and memorable characters I saw in the first film. It did have some funny parts I'll give you that, but not nearly as memorable or as much as the first film. The songs they used were basically remakes from the first film, which is lame. Long review short, this film was disappointing. Lacking humor, characters parts, and a good message. Because of this bad sequel, it can devalue the first film and probably a lot of people feel that way now. I don't recommend this, use your time and/or money on watching something else.
(3/10)
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Loved the original, they should have left the sexism out of this one too
The original Lego movie was witty and offbeat. It was a breath of fresh air from the staleness (super-hero and sequel factory) of Hollywood.
For whatever reason, the writers decided to push the sexism in this one - and like all other recent sexist children's movies from Hollywood, it's all one-sided sexism. It shouldn't be a surprise to most people as there were a lot of comments made to this effect (outside of the main stream media).
We use to have Peanuts (50s-70s), Scooby Doo (60s-70s), Heman and She-Ra (80s-90s) and NONE of these children's cartoons indoctrinated small children with sexism. Yet, in the last 5 years, we've "advanced as a society" and worked out that one-sided sexism is a good thing?
Save your money. See Storm Boy instead. It doesn't have sexism in it. It's just a story about a boy wanting to save pelicans. If you love sexism, you'll have Storm Boy. If you aren't into sexism, you'll get far more satisfaction out of Storm Boy.
28 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part (2019)
Directed by Mike Mitchell. Starring (voices) Chris Pratt, Elizabeth Banks, Will Arnett, Stephanie Beatriz, Tiffany Haddish, Charlie Day, Alison Brie, Nick Offerman, Richard Ayoade, Channing Tatum, Jonah Hill. (PG)
Shortly after the events of the first outing (Master Builder Emmet (Pratt) saves Bricksburg from Taco Tuesday doom), Duplo aliens invade and, years later, the world has turned into a post-apocalyptic wasteland, with a new looming disaster threatening them further: Armamageddon (no points for figuring out the obvious secret cause there). The luster is fading on this toy-movie franchise; it may remain watchable throughout, but too many gags are recycled and, despite a relatively short length (90+ minutes, not counting credits), the momentum drags on multiple occasions. Comprised of disparate, dizzying elements that are anything but interlocking pieces, the storyline (especially the mid-section) is a frenetic mess, only coming together when the real world infringes on the Lego one--same as the first, the logic and rules that link/separate them are muddy at best, and those "heavy" segments sap away all trace of glitzy, charming fun (plus, no sane parent would ever let their kids pack away Lego bricks like that). Most of the best moments belong to mini-fig cameos and side roles (Bruce Willis, the raptors, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, etc.); as a ghost or otherwise, Morgan Freeman's dry but smooth line readings are sorely missed. Aside from a reprise of "Everything is Awesome" and new tune "Super Cool" (from Beck, featuring the Lonely Island and Robyn), which doesn't land until the credits roll, the songs are all instantly forgettable--even the one promising to get stuck inside your head ("Catchy Song").
52/100
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Its only legOKay
Its more bizarre than the first.
You gotta be between the ages of 12 and 17 and be on something to accept its dumb humor and scenes.
The animation is the only thing that is done well. It's just the story that is uninteresting.
The movie is about the typical I got a vision, grow up and try to escape kind of movie. Yea i KNOW CLICHE.
Verdict: If you wondered why this one did not do well at the box office, watch it and you'll see. The 1st one is better.
Lego M2 is Another reason to delete your netflix.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Everything is still mediocre-ly awesome
Warning: Spoilers
The good part about Lego Movie 2 is that it's just as good as the first one. For me that means it was okay. It's entertaining, it has some okay laughs but it relies on the same humor and "Dad-jokes" the first one did and it panders to nostalgia in a very minuscule way for parents who are watching. The addition of the "real-world" was probably the best part of this sequel as it added some unique qualities to it and gave it a bit of a "toy-story"-esque spin which was appreciated. I also felt like they made this feel a little more like actual lego which was lacking from the first movie in some sense.
Chris Pratt returns in a dual role as the lovable Emmett and the new sidekick bad @$$ version of Emmett. Pratt's voice is perfect for this role and while in most animation I've seen it doesn't matter who is doing the voice, he really does a good job at this. Elizabeth Banks is also quite good as Lucy though I never felt she brings anything unique to the role that is a must have for her. The supporting cast are all good. Will Arnett's Batman has a large role in this and he has some of the best lines (again Dad-joke-esque) but funny. A small cameo by Bruce Willis as himself was the funniest part of the film for me but that's a personal bias.
The new music is fun and catchy (but not as incredibly catch as "everything is awesome") which still makes an appearance and will end up stuck in your head all over again believe it or not. Mike Mitchell is a great choice of director as he has a ton of animation experience and directed the amazing Trolls. All in all, it's fun, the kids will enjoy it again, it's more of the same and if you enjoyed the first you'll like enjoy this one too. Everything is mediocre, everything is cool when it's all the same, everything is just okay, it's not like living a dream. 6/10
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Move by a figure
The theme of the cartoon is very close recently in our family. We have constant wars for the right to own toys. Yes, and we partly feel the pain of leg-bitten Lego details.
Tellingly, the cartoon turned out to be very musical and cheerful. There is no such thing as in Lego-Ninjago. Everything is simple as 2x2, and this is interesting.
New heroes get acquainted with old ones, the "fathers and children" problem has disappeared, a new one has appeared - the oldest and youngest child in the family.
Our hero is still cheerful and cheerful, always young, always with coffee. His girlfriend asks him to grow up, but her request will turn her sideways. It is impossible to change a person for the sake of his, for it is not given to anyone except the one responsible for the change of personality. The new characters, which appeared in the second part, are as charming and attractive as the characters in the past film. They will be liked even by Batman Vasilyevich, the eternal loner.
In the cartoon can be found in the full composition of the Justice League. In general, there will be many references to other studio projects. This will appeal to adults, children are unlikely to appreciate it.
Total. An interesting project for both children and adults: mothers, fathers, grandmothers, grandfathers, great-grandmothers, great-grandfathers, aunts, uncles, and so on.
Have you bought a ticket yet?
7 out of 10
22 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Is everything I wanted of the sequel and MORE
Warning: Spoilers
I love a lot the original film (Is one of my favorites of all times), and I was excited they were gonna make a sequel in the moment I saw the ending of the first one. And after 5 years of waiting, It was not disappointing. I went so happy to see that this is the sequel I wanted to see and more. There's a lot of things that I love of this one: The story, the animation, the unexpected plot twists, the relationship between Emmet and Lucy, the fact that this movie is about both (While the first one was about Emmet), the jokes, the heartwarming moments, the dramatic tension of the film, how Emmet learns to grow up and Lucy how to be more soft, how it conects with Finn (The boy of the first one) and her sister and some other surprises that it left me laughing and droping my jaw down with some shocking moments. I would say, not all the jokes works in this one (There are some dumb jokes that are obviously made for the kids), but this is the sequel I was waiting to see all those five years Is not necessarily better than the first one, I would say, this one is at par with the original, and is an improvement over the last two movies we got in 2017 (The LEGO Batman is still pretty good, while Lego Ninjago is the weakest of the franchise). I really want to see a third one with taking the idea of the boy grown up and not being interested with playing Legos anymore and how it would affect this to the characters and the world they build up. But for now on, this one is just awesome. Maybe I will watching this one again in theaters.
42 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
martindalehows1953.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3513498/reviews
0 Response to "Lego Movie Run That by Me Again I Wasnt Listening"
Post a Comment